Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Performance
Compare measured TTFT, TTFB, throughput, uptime, and route health for Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash across TrustedRouter providers using metadata-only production probes.
google/gemini-2.5-flash
Measured performance
Continuously sampled p50/p95 time-to-first-token (TTFT), time-to-first-byte (TTFB), effective throughput, and success rate for Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash. Effective throughput uses provider-reported output tokens over complete request time. Unsupported route and probe-configuration rows are separated from provider downtime, and no prompt or output content is stored.
| Provider | p50 TTFT | p95 TTFT | p50 TTFB | Effective throughput | Uptime | Config excluded | Availability samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| google-vertex | 1384 ms | 1501 ms | 1384 ms | — | 100.00% | — | 5 |
| lightning | 1819 ms | 3203 ms | 1819 ms | — | 100.00% | — | 7 |
| google-ai-studio | 1888 ms | 2785 ms | 1888 ms | — | 100.00% | — | 7 |
Full provider & model leaderboard.
8 routes.
More routes give the auto router more room to fail over around provider 429 and 5xx responses.
Gateway overhead is measured separately.
Public status separates TLS/health overhead from full model latency so slow LLMs do not inflate the router metric.
Metadata rollups.
Status samples store latency, outcome, provider, model, route, cost, and region metadata only.
View public status or inspect provider routes.